Here I’m introducing to you, World, a new concept of mine, which I like to coin as “clock physics.” Now, keep in mind that this is not actual “physics” as in the science topic, but it just sounds cooler than saying “clock numerology” or some boring ish like that..so there ya have it. So, my basic idea here is that the shape and orientation of the clock hands in relation to one another, and in relation to the particular numbers they are pointing at, may, in general, hold some degree of significance. Of course, here I’m talking about the standard analog clock face that is used basically worldwide; however, we must keep in mind that the interpretation of what I’m about to explain here would obviously change depending on the orientation of numbers according to different types of clock faces seen throughout various cultures, particularly ancient historical sundial clocks in India where the day is split instead into 8-hour segments and therefore, with only numbers 1-8 on the clock.
Now, I feel that the orientation of the clock hands in relation to one another hold a special significance in terms of the numbers for the time represented. Consider this: we can have various angles created by the minute hand relative to the hour hand. Naturally, this can include a massive number of angles, all the way from 0 to 360 degrees; I mean, consider that there are only 12 clock digit positions or increments, compared to the other 48 points between these clock digits (so 48+12=60 total increments), which means the chance of a clock hand landing on these digits is only 12/60= 0.2; so a 20% or a 1/5 chance, which makes it more significant if you see this compared to any random angles of clock hands falling in between numbers. It’s much like the chances of seeing repeating number patterns versus any random numbers, and since more rare, organized number patterns have always been deemed relevant in numerology, then why not with clock hand positions? However, bear in mind though that the hour hand will not always perfectly rest on a digit increment, but the minute hand usually does, and even if both hands are slightly off the digit increments, still, as long as what I believe to be special, fixed angles are precisely maintained between the 2 main clock hands, then I believe this is of importance versus any random clock hand positioning. In fact, if you bear with me here, you will notice that the particular pattern of clock hands resting right on digit increments, as well as the special angles I introduce below, all result in special patterns of the time when written in digital format, such as: interestingly enough, repeating numbers when observing the minutes part of the digital time!
So then, what are these “special” angles that I’m talking about?: 30 and 60 degree “arrows,” 90 degree “brackets,” 120 and 150 degree “mountains.” At the same time, we also have configurations of oppositions: where the hour and minute hand are exactly opposite of one another much like in a “mirror-image,” and we also have “overlap alignments” where one clock hand is basically superimposed in a sense on the other, with one lying directly in line on top of the other as if to conceal it at the exact same position. I’ve decided that, similar to astrology (aspect for overlap alignments) arrows, mountains and overlap alignments are generally easy-going configurations, whereas brackets (akin to 90° angle squares) and oppositions are more difficult and rigid formations.
3 Comments
Leave your reply.